Insects as food source Public

Find ways to cultivate and mass-produce insects in great quantities and develop new insect-based food for humans and animals.
Views 4387, Members 7
5
5
[5 Ratings]
  • Category   Science & Innovation
  • Online   195 days
  • Headquarters   80636, Munich, Germany
    Food Factory Foundation
    Insects as food source to meet the world's present and future food needs
    During the past few years there has been a new upsurge of interest in insects as food. One factor that may be responsible is an increasing awareness in the western world that insects are traditional and nutritionally important food for many non-European cultures. Other factors may be increased pride in ethnic roots and traditions, increased concern about environment and overuse of pesticides, and better communication among scientists who are interested in the subject. Edible insects may be closer now than ever before to acceptance in the western world as a resource that should be considered in trying to meet the world's present and future food needs.
    An interesting and valuable substance for the medical industry: The Insects`Chitin Carcass
    Chitin comprises ~ 10% of whole dried insects. It is a carbohydrate polymer found in invertebrate exoskeletons, protozoa, fungi and algae, and is being called the polymer of the future because of its abundance, toughness and biodegradability (Goodman, 1989).

    Numerous applications of chitin and its derivatives (especially chitosan) are being found in medicine, agriculture and industry . In fact, chitin from shells of lobsters, crabs and crayfish has been approved by the Japanese for use in cereals as a source of fibre and calcium. If protein concentrates from dechitinized insects should become acceptable and pro- duced on a large scale, the chitin by-product could be of significant value as a fibre source.

    Investigators are calling chitin, with its abundance, toughness and biodegradable properties, the polymer of the future, according to Goodman. While insects and fungi have the highest ratio of chitin to body mass and global bioproduction is enormous, the primary source to date has been waste products generated by the shellfish industry. From the foregoing account by Goodman, it seems apparent that if protein concentrates from insects become acceptable and produced on a large scale, the chitin byproduct could be of significant value.
    Extremely high food conversion efficiency of crickets
    When the cosmopolitan house cricket, Acheta domesticus, was maintained at temperatures > 30°C and fed a diet of similarly high quality to that used in bringing beef animals to market size and condition, the food conversion efficiency of the crickets was estimated to be more than five times that of beef animals (Nakagaki and DeFoliart, 1991). When the high fecundity of the cricket is considered ( 1500 offspring per female cricket compared with four standing animals in the beef herd for each animal marketed), the true food conversion effi- ciency is closer to 15-20 times greater for the cricket than for beef.
    Traditional use and economic importance in non-European cultures
    Insects have played an important part in the history of human nutrition in Africa, Asia and Latin America (Bodenheimer, 1951). They were an equally important resource for the Indians of western North America, who, like other indigenous groups, expended much organization and effort in harvesting them (Sutton, 1988). Hundreds of species have been used as human food. Some of the more important groups include grass- hoppers, caterpillars, beetle grubs and (sometimes) adults, winged termites (some of which are very large in the tropics), bee, wasp and ant brood (larvae and pupae) as well as winged ants, cicadas, and a variety of aquatic insects.
    Blog
    From: http://www.new-ag.info/99-3/focuson/focuson4.html

    Insects are efficient recyclers of organic matter and they can provide a reliable and sustainable source of food for humans and/or animals, provided appropriate breeding methods are developed. Raising insects is relatively easy: they require minimal space and have a better conversion (feed to meat) ratio than any other meat.

    Most species are also lower in fat and higher in protein (7-21 grams of protein per 100 grams of edible insect) than larger livestock meat (beef, pork and chicken). They are also an important source of vitamins (in particular, riboflavin and thiamine) and minerals (mostly zinc, copper and iron). Traditional consumption involves eating the insects raw, boiled or roasted. However, for those not used to adding insects to their daily menu, they can be powdered and used as flour.

    Insect larvae can also be raised to feed to animals. Termite larvae are traditionally harvested from existing termatariums and fed to poultry as a protein supplement. However, experiments in Togo and Burkina Faso to provide a source of food (straw/leaves) for termites and site (cattle dung/soil) for a new colony have proved successful. In addition, maggots from Musca domestica and Sarcophaga sp. flies raised on animal droppings in West Africa have been fed to chickens. Chironomid larvae are also raised on chicken manure, harvested, cleaned and sold as feed to fish culture farms in Hong Kong. However, although these larvae can provide a valuable and cheap protein feed for fish and poultry, these insects can be a significant source of micro-organisms and the risks of disease transmission to domestic animals and humans should be considered.

    From: http://www.teatronaturale.com/article/1346.html

    Besides their nutritional value, many experts see in edible insects a big marketing potential for the rural populations that capture, breed, process and sell insects. These prospective could be encouraged by promoting the introduction of modern alimentary technologies for the preservation of insects which are sold and eaten alive, dried, smoked, roasted or treated in other ways.

    From: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,332172,00.html

    (...) The challenge, experts said, is organizing unregulated, small bug food operations in many countries so they can supplement the food that aid agencies provide. The infrastructure to raise, transport and market bugs is almost nonexistent in most countries.

    From: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/magazine/10wwln-essay-t.html?_r=2&oref...

    As it turns out, not very. While insects carry an abundance of microbial flora, they do not regularly harbor human pathogens like salmonella and E. coli. Put another way, insects don’t seem any more prone to disease than cows, pigs, chickens or fish, all of which need to be raised and cooked properly. It can also be argued that these insects boost the nutritional content of what we already eat. Bugs compare favorably to traditional livestock in available protein and fatty acids; for some vitamins and minerals, they better them by a wide margin.


    From: www.insectsarefood.com

    According to the Entomological Society of America insects generally contain more protein and are lower in fat than traditional meats. In addition they have about 20 times higher food conversion efficiency than traditional meats. In other words they have a better feed-to-meat ratio than beef, pork, lamb or chicken.

    It can best be understood at least in part with a comparative breakdown of cricket to beef. 100 grams of cricket contains 121 calories, 12.9 grams of protein, 5.5 g. fat, 5.1 g. carbohydrates, 75.8 mg. calcium, 9.5 mg. iron, 3.10 mg. niacin, 1.09 mg. riboflavin, 185.3 mg. phosphorous, and 0.36 mg. thiamine. By comparison ground beef contains more protein (23.5 g./100g.), but also has 288.2 calories, almost three times the amount of crickets, and a whopping 21.2 grams of fat, almost four times the amount of crickets!

    Insects are exothermic, which means they get their heat from the surrounding environment, while birds and mammals are endothermic, which means they have to heat themselves up, requiring lots of energy and consequently a major impact on the environment and on natural resources. The big advantage to being exothermic in this respect is that insects save a huge amount of energy.

    And comparatively speaking, being able to survive on a fifth of the amount of food required of familiar livestock is a major advantage when considering the impact of our footprint on the environment. Farming insects as miniature livestock is a smarter, more efficient and ultimately environmentally safer means of sustaining a healthy and convenient food supply.

    Insects reproduce at a much quicker rate than cattle, are much easier to raise and need far less living space and are able to feed off of much less feed than traditional livestock require.

    According to the University of Ohio’s Department of Entomology Fact Sheet Findings, if Americans could tolerate more insects in what they eat, farmers could significantly reduce the amount of pesticides applied each year. It’s also important to note that in farming and raising insects, there would be no labor intensive butchering of animals, no back-breaking farm work, no need for tractors, and no need for veterinary bills.

    Investigators are calling chitin, with its abundance, toughness and biodegradable properties, the polymer of the future (Goodman).

    While insects and fungi have the highest ratio of chitin to body mass and global bioproduction is enormous, the primary source to date has been waste products generated by the shellfish industry.

    If protein concentrates from insects become acceptable and produced on a large scale, the chitin byproduct could be of significant value.

    Thanks for your statements! Really great!

    I am not sure if the carbon dioxide emissions per kg will be lower with insect than with mammal breeding - but I would bet on it!

    Carbon dioxide is an end product in organisms that obtain energy from breaking down sugars, fats and amino acids with oxygen as part of their metabolism, in a process known as cellular respiration. This includes all kind of animals - mammals and insects likewise.

    But given the high food conversion efficiency of insects which in some cases is 15-20 times greater than for beef it seems to be obvious (at least for me) that their carbon dioxide emissions per kg are lower.

    Another aspect is the high fecundity of insects. This will give professional insect farmers a great opportunity to breed them selective, purposeful, and well directed.

    The best questions really is: Is there any company betting big money on this in Europe/US (yet)? If they are not - we should!

    Looking forward to hearing from you!

    Best wishes,

    Daniel

    Hello together,

    here is some really good feedback from other Amazee users to the project. I really would like to hear more from you and keep the discussion up!

    Best wishes,


    Daniel


    1.
    "Daniel, my words! I love shrimps, why shouldn't I eat some crunchy insects? Not to mention all the atrocities in livestock breeding; and of course the overfishing... let's roll out those cricket burgers! One more question that just came to my mind - do you think that the carbon dioxide emissions will be lower with insect breeding than with mammal breeding - per kg?"

    2.
    "Well, I am a somewhat passionate carnivore, but I can't imagine eating insects. But I agree wigh you, Juan, it is probably just a question of getting accustomed to it. We'll see. My grandfather thought eating pasta was a funny idea, maybe I'll shake my head at my grandchildren crunching away on a beetle burger. ;)

    Very interesting topic, though. Thanks for bringing it up, Daniel!"

    3.
    "Bring on the insects. I luuuves me some crunchiness.
    Seriously though: It's probably going to take a generation or two before eating bugs catches on around here. I guess this would also diminish the ecological impact of cattle and pig farming (and the like).

    I'm wondering: Is there any company betting big money on this in Europe/US (yet)?"

    Dear Amazee Team,

    thanks for your nice little article!

    Just to add a few more interesting thoughts I would like to mention that the western world already loves all kind of crabs and scampi which are - from an evolutionary point of view - very close to insects on land.

    Also I would like to note the cruelty and inhumanity in todays intensive mass animal farming. You would nearly loose this moral guilt completely if you start mass farming insects instead.

    Last but not least I would like to mention another big problem we are facing right now: The overfishing of our oceans! Often the catch ends up as fish food for fish farms again. Why don`t we feed at least these fish farms with insects and take less out of the oceans?

    I am looking forward to hearing from all of you and discuss this fascinating topic. Maybe we come up with a good idea or even a buisiness concept!

    Best wishes,

    daniel

    Blog
    Have you ever eaten an insect (not counting flies swallowed while cycling with your mouth open)? If so, you've most likely come across this exotic food on your holiday somewhere in Asia or Africa. Non-european cultures have known insects as food for many centuries, and they could become a world-wide ingredient of local cuisines – it is only rational.

    Everything speaks for the locust and other insects: They reproduce quickly and a lot, they are very nutritious and there seems to be endless varieties. Will we all end up eating the little animals? It is hard to imagine, but our user Daniel Kövary has started a project to promote just that.

    How about you? Can you imagine eating, let's say, a locust? Have you tasted it before? Would you eat it if it meant the solution to all food supply problems? Please share your insights and opinions with us. For the moment, we remain skeptical if this could become a regular addition to our diets. But we love to be convinced of a good idea!