Abolish the Death Penalty

Austin
Members341
Rating
[74]

    Death Row Exoneree Speaking at Democratic Convention

    Blog

    TMN has Major Success at Texas Democratic Convention

    07/02/2010 10:12am by Scott Cobb

    The Texas Democratic Party held its 2010 State Convention June 25-26 in Corpus Christi and adopted a party platform that endorses a moratorium on executions. The convention was attended by more than 7,000 delegates. The party platform has supported a moratorium in every platform since 2004.

    In addition to adopting a moratorium in the platform, the Resolutions Committee of the TDP State Convention also passed a resolution in support of a moratorium. Juan Melendez, an innocent person who was wrongfully convicted and spent 17 years on death row before being exonerated and released, was allowed to address the Resolutions Committee when it was considering the moratorium resolution. The photo at left in this post is of Juan addressing the Resolutions Committee.

    Below is the language in the platform from the section on capital punishment.
    Capital Punishment
    When capital punishment is imposed, Texans must be assured that it is fairly administered. Texas Democrats extend our deepest sympathies to all victims of crime and especially to the families of murder victims, and we strongly support their rights. The Texas death penalty system has been severely criticized by religious leaders, appellate courts and major newspapers that have observed that the current system cannot ensure that innocent or undeserving defendants are not sentenced to death. The Dallas Morning News has called for abolition of the death penalty in Texas.

    In the modern era, Texas has executed over 400 people, far more than any other state in the nation. The frequency of executions and inadequacies in our criminal justice system increase the likelihood that an innocent person will be executed. The State of Texas may have already executed at least two innocent people, according to major newspaper investigations into the cases of Carlos DeLuna and Cameron Todd Willingham. Another inmate, Ernest Willis, was exonerated and released from Texas Death Row in 2004 after 17 years of wrongful imprisonment.
    We condemn Governor Perry’s manipulation of the forensic science commission investigation of the science which led to the execution of a possibly innocent person.
    In order to promote public confidence in the fairness of the Texas criminal justice system, Texas Democrats support the establishment of a Texas Capital Punishment Commission to study the Texas death penalty system and a moratorium on executions pending action on the Commission’s findings.
    Texas Democrats support the following specific reforms:
    • establishing a statewide Office of Public Defenders for Capital Cases to ensure that every person accused of a capital crime has equal access to well-trained trial and appellate attorneys, regardless of income, race or the county of jurisdiction;
    • allowing testing of any possibly exculpatory DNA evidence to ensure guilt or innocence before executions are carried out, and allowing testing of DNA evidence after an execution to determine if an innocent person has been executed;
    • establishing procedures to determine before a trial takes place whether an accused has mental retardation, in order to be sure that Texas complies with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ban on executions of people with mental retardation;
    • banning death sentences and executions for people with mental illness;
    • requiring the Board of Pardons and Paroles to meet in person to discuss and vote on every case involving the death sentence;
    • restoring the power to the Governor to grant clemency in death penalty cases without a recommendation from the Board of Pardons and Paroles. To restore public confidence in the process, the Board should meet in public and decisions should be made by majority vote;
    • when the imposition of the death penalty is before the Parole Board or the Governor we urge consideration of all reasonably certain scientific or factual evidence that has become known since the trial; and
    • reforming statutes related to the “Law of Parties,” to make sure individuals who actually commit crimes are the primary focus of prosecution.

    Here is a video of Juan Melendez speaking to the Resolutions Committee, followed by the Committee discussing the issue, and ending with several members coming up to Juan to offer him handshakes and hugs. Be sure to watch for the standing ovation given to Juan by the committee after his remarks and before they start discussing the issue. It was a very touching moment.

    Juan Melendez said, "I was extremely moved by the response of the Resolutions Committee following my testimony and I would like to thank everyone of the Committee members for voting unanimously for a moratorium resolution. I truly believe that the Texas Democratic party is on the right side of history on this and that it is both a morally and politically sound position to take."

    On Friday at the TDP State Convention, Juan Melendez gave a 30 minute talk about his experience as an innocent person being sentenced to death to a meeting of the "Democrats Against the Death Penalty" caucus. Also speaking were Rep Lon Burnam, Judi Caruso, Jamie Bush who introduced Juan Melendez and Keith Hampton who dropped by to introduce himself to the caucus attendees. Keith is a candidate for judge on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The caucus was founded in 2004 by Scott Cobb of Texas Moratorium Network.

    Juan Melendez's appearance at the TDP State Convention was organized by Texas Moratorium Network and supported by Witness to Innocence, which made it possible for Juan Melendez to fly to Texas for the convention.

    Juan also spent a lot of time at the convention talking to people who came by the booth of Texas Moratorium Network in the exhibition area. In the photo below are Jamie Bush, Scott Cobb, Alison Dieter, Juan Melendez and Judi Caruso - the Texas Moratorium Network/Witness to Innocence team at the convention. Sherri Clausell and Angie Agapetus, two anti-death penalty activists from Houston, also attended the convention.

    Comments

    Donations Welcome to Help Us Bring Six Death Row Exonerees to Alternative Spring Break

    06/02/2010 08:06am by Scott Cobb

    If anyone would like to help us train the next generation of anti-death penalty activists by donating to the Anti-Death Penalty Alternative Spring Break, you can donate by paypal or by sending a check to:

    Texas Moratorium Network
    3616 Far West Blvd, Suite 117, Box 251
    Austin, Texas 78731

    paypal@texasmoratorium.org or use this url
    http://tinyurl.com/yeau24m

    We have students registered from across Texas and some from other states. They will spend four days in Austin with six innocent people exonerated from death row. We will teach them about the injustice of the death penalty and how to work to change public policy. There will be workshops on working with the media, building coalitions, art and activism, lobbying, religion and the death penalty, mental illness, murder victims family members, and more. On the last day, the students will organize a press conference and panel discussion at the capitol and a couple of them will speak at the rally on the south steps of the Texas Capitol along with the six death row exonerees.

    The full schedule of events is on the website:

    http://springbreakalternative.org/deathpenalty

    Thanks!

    Comments

    David Lee Powell Scheduled for Execution June 15th in Texas

    03/04/2010 08:59am by Scott Cobb

    http://www.letdavidlive.org

    After more than 30 years, a date is set for the execution of a man convicted in the killing of an Austin police officer.

    David Lee Powell is on death row for shooting and killing Officer Ralph Ablanedo in 1978.

    Powell will be executed by lethal injection June 15.

    Comments

    Vote for " Abolish the Death Penalty " in the Ideas for Change contest at Change.org

    02/23/2010 12:36pm by Scott Cobb
    ideaforchange.jpg

    http://www.change.org/ideas/view/abolish_the_death_penalty

    Texas Moratorium Network sent an email out a few days ago asking people to vote for "Abolish the Death Penalty" in the Ideas for Change contest at Change.org. 236 TMN members have voted so far, which is a little more than one-quarter of the total votes of 820 as of now. Thanks for everyone who already voted. If you have not yet voted, please do. We need another hundred votes or so to move into the top ten. The idea was started at change.org by Gilles Denizot . Nice job Gilles!

    http://www.change.org/ideas/view/abolish_the_death_penalty

    Take a moment to vote for the Abolish the Death Penalty as an Idea for Change in America at Change.org. (You will have to register atChange.org to vote.) If the idea becomes one of the top ten, Change.org will host an event in Washington, DC, where each of the 10 ideas will be presented to representatives of the media, the nonprofit community, and to relevant officials in the Obama Administration. After the announcement, Change.org will mobilize the full resources of their staff, their 1 million community members, and their extended network of bloggers to support a series of grassroots campaigns to turn each idea into reality.

    This is the second annual ideas competition powered by Change.org. The first competition was launched immediately following the 2008 presidential election, during which time people submitted more than 7,500 ideas and 650,000 votes.

    How it Works

    Beginning January 20, 2010, individuals and organizations everywhere can (1) submit ideas for change they want to see implemented, (2) discuss these ideas with others, and (3) vote for their favorite ideas and promote them across the web.

    During the first round of voting, ideas will be organized into 20 different issue-based categories. First round voting ends at 5pm ET on February 25th, at which point the three top ranked ideas in each category will advance to the second (and final) round of voting, starting March 1, 2010 . In this final round, all 60 qualifying ideas (top three in each of 20 categories) will be in open competition. The final round of voting concludes at 5pm ET on March 11th, and the 10 most popular ideas at the conclusion of voting will be named winners – the “Top 10 Ideas for Change in America.”

    The Top 10 Ideas for Change in America

    To formally announce the winners, Change.org will host an event in Washington, DC, whereeach of these top 10 ideas will be presented to representatives of the media, the nonprofit community, and to relevant officials in the Obama Administration. After the announcement, Change.org will mobilize the full resources of their staff, their 1 million community members, and their extended network of bloggers to support a series of grassroots campaigns to turn each idea into reality.
    How to Turn this Idea into Reality?

    We need to remain first and be amongst the Top 10 Ideas for Change in America on March 4th, 2010. We need to build a movement to support this idea and bring it to Washington D.C.

    We need to understand that it will ONLY happen if we do what we need to make it happen. And we only have until February 25th, 2010! Let’s get ready for Washington D.C.

    Comments

    Demand DNA Testing for Hank Skinner: Execution Set for March 24

    02/19/2010 09:09am by Scott Cobb
    hankskinner.jpg

    Texas Moratorium Network sent an email out asking people to sign the petition for Hank Skinner that sends an email to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. It looks like the number of signers went up by about 500 soon after the email went out, so thank you to all the TMN members who signed. The total is now over 5,000. If you have not signed yet, please do.

    Sign the petition here:

    http://www.change.org/actions/view/hey_texas_please_dont_execute_an_inno...

    Write, call, fax or email your own letter to the Board of Pardons and Paroles and Texas Governor Rick Perry. Urge them to stay the execution to allow testing of DNA. In the subject line of your emails or in any letters to the Board of Pardons and Paroles, write "Attention Case of Hank Skinner #999143".

    Hank Skinner is scheduled to be executed in Texas on March 24 for three murders he maintains he didn't commit. Several key pieces of biological evidence from the crime scene have not been tested. DNA testing could prove Skinner's innocence or confirm his guilt, but prosecutors are opposing Skinner's appeals and seeking to execute him. There are several pieces of probative biological evidence from the crime scene that haven't been tested. Among this untested evidence are hairs from one victim's hand, a rape kit, fingernail clippings and a windbreaker that could have been worn by an alternate suspect. It is crucial that this testing be conducted before Texas carries out a sentence it can't reverse.

    DNA testing can prove the truth. It is not a delay tactic or a diversion -- it has the potential to confirm Skinner's guilt or prove him innocent and you would be making a grave mistake to allow Skinner to executed without first conducting DNA tests.

    Office of the Governor
    P.O. Box 12428
    Austin, Texas 78711-2428
    Fax: 512-463-1849
    Main number: 512-463-2000
    Website email contact form

    Clemency Section
    Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
    8610 Shoal Creek Blvd.
    Austin, TX 78757-6814
    Fax (512) 467-0945
    bpp-pio@tdcj.state.tx.us

    Comments
    Display older posts

    Anti-Death Penalty Alternative Spring Break

    http://springbreakalternative.org/deathpenalty Join us March 15-19, 2010 in Austin, Texas for the award-winning Anti-Death Penalty Alternative Spring Break. It's free, except for a $25 housing fee for those who need us to arrange housing for you. We will house you in a shared room with other spring breakers in either a hotel or dorm. You are responsible for your travel, food and other expenses, but the program and most of the housing costs are on us. The $25 housing fee is all you pay. * Recipient of the 2007 Campus Progress Award for "Action Campaign of the Year" * Featured on MTV"s TRL and "The Amazing Break" * Workshops on Grassroots Organizing, Organizing Demonstrations, Media Relations, Lobbying, the Death Penalty, and more Alternative Spring Breaks are designed to give college and high school students something more meaningful to do during their week off, rather than just spending time at the beach or sitting at home catching up on school work. The specific purpose of the Death Penalty Alternative Spring Break is to bring students together for five days of anti-death penalty activism, education and entertainment. This is the place to be if you want to become a part of the next generation of human rights leaders. Go to the beach to change your state of mind for a week, come here to change the world forever We will provide participants with workshops led by experienced, knowledgeable presenters who will teach them skills that they can use to go back home and set up new anti-death penalty student organizations or improve ones that may already exist. The skills participants will learn can also be used in other issues besides the death penalty. Students will gain valuable training and experience in grassroots organizing, lobbying, preparing a direct action and media relations. During the week, students will immediately put what they learn into action during activities such as a Death Penalty Issues Lobby Day and a Protest Day. There will be opportunities to write press releases, speak in public, meet with legislators or their aides, and conceive and carry out a direct action.

    Start: 03/15/2010 01:14pm
    End: 03/19/2010 01:14pm
    Timezone: America/Chicago (-05:00)
    The number of attendees is not limited.

    Attending (1)

    Maybe attending (0)

    No attendees registered yet

    Not attending (0)

    No attendees registered yet

    Protest Rick Perry's 200th Execution

    hilmer.jpg

    Protest 200th Execution Under Current Texas Governor Rick Perry

    Visit http://www.protest200executions.com.

    On June 2, 2009, the 200th execution under Texas Governor Rick Perry is scheduled to take place. Since he became governor of Texas in December 2000, Perry has signed more execution orders than any other governor in U.S. history.

    Terry Hankins is scheduled to be the 200th person executed under Rick Perry. If he or anyone scheduled before him receives a stay of execution, then the 200th person will be the next person on the list. We hope everyone receives a stay!

    The Texas anti-death penalty community asks people around the world to focus your attention on Texas and join us in protesting the 200th execution carried out under Rick Perry. Altogether, Texas has executed 436 people since 1982, including 152 under former Texas Governor George W. Bush.

    How you can protest the 200th execution under Texas Governor Rick Perry

    Visit http://www.protest200executions.com for updates.

    1) On the day of the 200th execution, call Governor Perry at 512-462-1782 and tell him your opinion on the death penalty. If you live in the U.S., you can use his the form on his website to email him. We suggest you both call him and email him. If you live outside the U.S., you can fax him at (512) 463-1849 or send him a letter in the postal mail. We would like to hand deliver letters to him, so please send your letter to the address below and we will deliver it to Rick Perry: You can send us your letter to Perry for us to deliver whether you live in the U.S. or another country.

    Texas Moratorium Network
    3616 Far West Blvd, Suite 117, Box 251
    Austin, Texas 7831

    2) Attend a protest in your city either on the day of the 200th execution or sometime before. There are protests already planned. If a protest is not scheduled yet in your city, you can organize a protest. If you live outside the U.S., organize a protest at the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate. Send us a photo or video of your protest by email and we will post it on this website and on YouTube. Or you can upload your photos and videos yourself to our social networking site or directly to our group on YouTube. If your organization is planning a protest, please let us know so that we can list your protest on this site.

    3) Sign the petition and add your name to the list of people who are raising their voices to protest the 200th execution under Texas Governor Rick Perry.

    4) Donate a symbolic 200 cents towards helping us organize against the Texas death penalty. That is one penny for every execution under Rick Perry. We are asking everyone to donate $2, which is the equivalent of 200 pennies. You are welcome to donate more if you can afford it, but everyone can afford to donate $2.

    The artwork at the top of www.protest200executions.com is by German artist Jasmin Hilmer and represents the isolation of Texas in the world community. While most of the rest of the world, including all of Europe, have turned their backs on the use of capital punishment, Texas continues to execute people at a shocking rate.

    This campaign is sponsored by Texas Moratorium Network, Texas Death Penalty Abolition Movement, Campaign to End the Death Penalty - Austin, Students Against the Death Penalty, Texas Death Penalty Education and Resource Center, Abolish the Death Penalty Project on Amazee. If your organization would also like to be a sponsor, email us at admin@texasmoratorium.org or call 512-961-6389.

    Upcoming Scheduled Executions in Texas

    To protest these executions, call Governor Perry (512) 463-1782 or email Perry at http://www.governor.state.tx.us/contact

    Scheduled Executions in Texas

    Michael Sigala March 2

    Joshua Maxwell March 11

    Hank Skinner March 24 (Strong Innocence Claim)
    Website for Hank Skinner
    http://hankskinner.org

    Alix Franklin March 30

    Samuel Bustamante April 20

    William Berkley April 22

    John Alba May 25

    Johathan Green June 30

    Michael Perry July 1





    Don't Forget to Upload a Profile Picture

    Please upload a profile picture or avatar.

    Click on "Personal" above on the right, then under the Profile tab, click "My Profile/Password". The picture upload button is near the bottom, click "browse" to choose a picture from your computer, then hit "save".

    Death Penalty News

    Texas Digest: Death penalty sought in beheadings; woman gets 20 years in cold case
    28.07.2010 11:13

    A 29-year-old man convicted of beheading his common-law wife's three children did not show remorse after the gruesome killings and was not a model inmate during an earlier stint on death row, prosecution witnesses told jurors Tuesday.

    Japan hangs 2 on death row, including man who burned 6 to death, in 1st executions in a year
    28.07.2010 07:13

    Japan hanged two convicted killers Wednesday, including a man who burned six women to death, in the country's first executions in a year, and the justice minister said she wants renewed debate on whether to continue the punishment.

    Iran stoning case woman fainted on hearing sentence, says cellmate
    28.07.2010 04:08

    For days, Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani was like 'a ghost wandering in shock' after receiving death penalty A former cellmate of a woman sentenced to death by stoning in Iran , who spent two years in prison with her and accompanied her to the court when she received the news of her punishment, has told the Guardian how the woman, Sakineh Mohammadi ...

    Convicted Murderer Accused of Setting Fire in Cell
    28.07.2010 04:08

    Testimony continues in the sentencing phase for John Allen Rubio. The Brownsville man was convicted for stabbing and beheading his three children in March 2003.

    No death penalty for accused murderer of UT student
    28.07.2010 02:00

    Lisa Bucher wants her son's killer to get the death penalty. But the man who confessed to stabbing and killing the 22-year-old University of Toledo student won't be going to death row.

    Abolish the Death Penalty

    stop_executions.jpg

    Protesting the Death Penalty

    Protesting the Death Penalty by surrounding the Texas Governor's Mansion with Yellow Crime Scene Tape - 2005 March Protesters at Governor's Mansion in Texas Protesting the death penalty in Houston - 2007 2000 March Against the Death Penalty Austin Texas 2000 March Against the Death Penalty Austin Texas 2004 Austin Texas Crime Scene Tape at Governor's Mansion Kerry Cook, Exonerated from Death Row, in Austin 2001 Houston 2007 Oct 25, 2008 in Houston at 9th Annual March to Stop Executions Oct 25, 2008 in Houston at 9th Annual March to Stop Executions Oct 25, 2008 in Houston at 9th Annual March to Stop Executions

    Rally and March to Save Jeff Wood: Austin August 16, 2008

    Artwork on the Death Penalty

    "The End" by Jasmin Hilmer of Germany on display in Houston's Gallery M2 Thou Shalt Not Kill Materials: Graphite on Paper     Size: 52" x 39"     Price: $3000   by Claude van Lingen Seven times Materials: Installation     Size: 1,70 x 2,10 meter   by Robert Kunec   Halle/Saale  Germany World Wide Patent Fig. 1 Materials: Adhesive tape on printed drawing     Size: 29,8 cm x 21 cm  by Thomas Buchner Walter Bell, Jr. and his mother; from the portrait series Mentally retarded on Texas' Death Row Materials: photography     Size: 14x14 Doing God's Work Materials: Watercolour     Size: 7" x 10" by Shanon Playford

    More News

    Iran stoning case woman fainted on hearing sentence, says cellmate
    28.07.2010 12:01

    For days, Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani was like 'a ghost wandering in shock' after receiving death penalty.A former cellmate of a woman sentenced to death by stoning in Iran, who spent 2 years in prison with her and accompanied her to the court when she received the news of her punishment, has told the Guardian how the woman, Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, fainted in shock after hearing the verdict."It was in mid-November 2008 when the guards woke us up unexpectedly and told Sakineh and me that we should get ready for the court," said Shahnaz Gholami, 42, whose political activities in support of Azari minorities put her in jail for more than four years in Iran. Gholami, an active blogger, is seeking asylum in Paris.Later that morning, the officials handcuffed Mohammadi Ashtiani and Gholami and took them to the court. Gholami said: "During the 15-minute journey to the court from the prison, she was just worried for her children, but she was not expecting anything even a bit close to the stoning. When we met once again after the court, she was appalled, absolutely speechless."The 43-year-old mother of 2 fainted in shock when they returned to the prison, Gholami said. "For days, she was like a ghost wandering in shock, but when she came back to her senses, she just cried and I didn't see her without crying until the last day I spent time with her in prison."The Guardian brought Mohammadi Ashtiani's plight to international attention on 3 July. Since then the case has drawn condemnation worldwide and a huge number of politicians, human rights activists and celebrities have joined the campaign for her release. In response, Iran has banned local media from reporting on the case.Gholami – whose comments cannot be independently verified – said Mohammadi Ashtiani was tortured inside Tabriz prison. "Because of her loving nature, even her malicious cellmates kept distance from her, but the guards couldn't let her live at ease. She was flogged as a part of her sentence, but beside that she was beaten up severely by the guards." According to Gholami, Mohammadi Ashtiani has been refused access to writing materials."Until that day she was a calm, ordinary woman whose beauty made prisoners and the guards jealous. She didn't like trouble with other women in the block we were kept in, and because of that she was always alone," Gholami said.Since May 2006, Mohammadi Ashtiani has been kept in room four of the eighth block of Tabriz prison, in the capital of Iran's East Azerbaijan province. She shares a room with 25 women who are mostly accused of murder. She was originally sentenced to 99 lashes for adultery, but her case was reopened when a court in Tabriz suspected her of murdering her husband. She was acquitted, but the adultery charge was reviewed and the death penalty handed down on the basis of "judge's knowledge". In Iran, officials consider adultery worse than murder, Gholami said."To be among those murderers and live with them is a daily torture for Sakineh, whose tender nature had made her exceptional in the block for everyone," Gholami said.Iran's judiciary has since changed the sentence, following the international outcry, to execution by hanging "because she is convicted of murder". However, a copy of the document detailing the stoning sentence, which was disclosed to the Guardian by Mina Ahadi, of the Iran Committee against Stoning (ICAS), shows that she was convicted of adultery, not murder.Ahadi said: "In adultery cases, women are sentenced because of the complaints from their husbands or families generally, but surprisingly, Sakineh is sentenced to death by stoning not because the family of her husband have made a complaint against her, but because the Tabriz prosecutor has made a complaint. In other words, it's the authorities in Iran who want Sakineh to be stoned to death."Ahadi, who is in regular contact with the families of women sentenced to stoning in Iran, has been told recently that Mariam Ghorbanzadeh, 25, a current cellmate of Mohammadi Ashtiani who has been sentenced to death by stoning, is pregnant. The sentence has not been changed.After a short visit to his mother in prison last Thursday, Mohammadi Ashtiani's son Sajad told the Guardian that she fears she may be executed without prior notice to her lawyer, especially now that Iran has issued an arrest warrant for Mohammad Mostafaei, the lawyer who represented her until recently. Mostafaei is believed to be hiding from officials after his relatives were imprisoned.Source: The Guardian, July 28, 2010It's not about what they did. It's about what we do.

    Wisma Putra pleads for Sabahan Yong Vui Kong on Singapore death row
    28.07.2010 11:54

    The Foreign Ministry sent a letter to the Singapore government last week to plead for clemency for young Sabahan Yong Vui Kong, who was sentenced to death in the city state for drug trafficking.Deputy Foreign Minister A. Kohilan Pillay told senator Datuk Saripah Aminah Syed Mohamed that the letter from Wisma Putra was addressed to the President of Singapore for his consideration."Yong's family had also written to the President of Singapore," he said.Yong, 22, was convicted on Jan 7 last year for trafficking in 47gm of diamorphine, a capital offence under the Singaporea Misuse of Drugs Act.Yong was arrested on June 13, 2007. He was 18 when he committed the offence.The last day for Yong to file his petition for clemency is Aug 26, after which he may be hanged at any time.In his reply, Kohilan also said 2 Malaysians, convicted of drug trafficking in China and Japan respectively, had their sentences reduced.In the case of Umi Azlim Mohammad Lazim, who was also sentenced to death by a High Court in Guangzhou, China, her death sentence was reduced to life imprisonment.The former Universiti Malaysia Sabah student from Kelantan was found guilty of trafficking in 2.983kg of heroin in Shantao airport, and was sentenced to death on May 15, 2007 at the age of 23.In the case of Raja Munirah Iskandar Shah, who was convicted of trafficking in 690.8g of syabu in Narita International Airport in 2006 at the age of 21, her sentence was reduced from 7 years and four months to 6 years and 9 months.Click here to sign Yong Vui Kong online clemency petition.Source: The Star, July 28, 2010It's not about what they did. It's about what we do.

    Japan hangs 2 death row inmates, 1st execution in 1 year
    28.07.2010 11:21

    Japan hanged 2 death row inmates Wednesday in the 1st execution under the Democratic Party of Japan government launched last September, Justice Minister Keiko Chiba said.The 2 are Kazuo Shinozawa, 59, who was accused of murder in 2000 involving 6 female clerks at a jewelry store in Utsunomiya, Tochigi Prefecture, and Hidenori Ogata, 33, who was responsible for killing a man and woman and seriously injuring 2 others in Saitama Prefecture in 2003, according to the Justice Ministry.Chiba said she herself attended the execution at the Tokyo Detention House. "I attended the executions today as I believe it is my duty to see through (the process) as the person who orders it," she told a press conference. It was probably the 1st time that a justice minister attended an execution, according to Chiba. While declining to comment on her personal views, Chiba expressed readiness to establish a panel at the Justice Ministry to study the death penalty and to allow news media to visit the death chamber at the Tokyo Detention House.Related article: Death Penalty Opponent Keibo Chiba made Japan's Justice MinisterSource: Japan Today, July 28, 2010 - Photo: Osaka gallows2 executed in JapanJapan hanged 2 death row inmates in the 1st execution under the Democratic Party of Japan government launched last September, Justice Minister Keiko Chiba (pictured below) told a press conference Wednesday.The 2 are Kazuo Shinozawa, who was accused of murder in 2000 involving 6 female clerks at a jewelry store in Utsunomiya, Tochigi Prefecture, and Hidenori Ogata, who was involved in a double murder case in 2003, according to the Justice Ministry.Chiba said she herself attended the execution.The last time the ministry executed death row inmates was July 28 last year, when the Liberal Democratic Party was still in power and hanged 3 inmates.Chiba, a former member of the Japan Parliamentary League against the Death Penalty, had held a cautious stance on executions since assuming the post last September.She may be replaced soon as she lost her seat in the House of Councillors election earlier this month.Source: Associated Press, July 28, 2010Japan hangs two death row inmatesJapan has hanged two death row inmates, in the first executions since the new government took power last year.The two prisoners, both convicted killers, were hanged at the Tokyo Detention Centre.Justice Minister Keiko Chiba (left) - who opposes the death penalty - witnessed the executions and announced the formation of a group to review the death penalty.Opinion polls show broad support for capital punishment in Japan.The two men executed were Kazuo Shinozawa, 59, convicted of killing six women in a jewellery shop fire, and Hidenori Ogata, 33, who killed a man and a woman in 2003.Ms Chiba said that as justice minister she believed it was her duty to witness the executions in person."It made me again think deeply about the death penalty, and I once again strongly felt that there is a need for a fundamental discussion about the death penalty," she said.Ms Chiba's appointment in September - when the new Democratic Party-led government came to power - was seen as a sign that debate could be opened on the issue.A total of 107 inmates remain on death row in Japan. Prisoners are usually executed two or three at a time.Last year, a report from rights group Amnesty International called for an immediate moratorium on executions in Japan, saying that harsh conditions on death row were driving inmates insane.Prisoners are not told when they will be executed and their relatives are told only after the sentence has been carried out. Related reading: Japanese death row breeds insanitySource: BBC News, Jumy 28, 2010It's not about what they did. It's about what we do.

    The CSI Effect: Big Surprise, TV is Dramatized
    27.07.2010 17:59

    Have you ever watched the popular television shows “Bones” or “Dexter”? Or how about one of the many “CSI” spinoffs? If your answer is yes, then you've been exposed to one of the newest trends to impact the forensic science field: the CSI Effect.The CSI Effect refers to the influence popular crime and forensic TV shows have on the public—especially jurors involved in criminal trials. On shows like “CSI” and “Law & Order”, the science looks very cut and dry: either the DNA matches or it doesn't, and the fingerprint always belongs to a possible suspect. In reality, science is not always so conclusive.Unreasonable JurorsIn the United States, criminal defendants are tried by a jury of their peers—people who supposedly hold no grudges against the defendant or biases about the case. But modern juries, influenced by the unrealistic forensic science techniques shown on popular TV shows, are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the work performed by police officers, forensic science professionals, and even lawyers.A 2008 study conducted by Monica Robbers, an American criminologist, found that 62 percent of defense lawyers and 69 percent of judges believe jurors have unrealistic expectations about the reliability of forensic evidence. The problem is that many jurors are programmed by their favorite television shows to expect copious amounts of conclusive DNA or fingerprint evidence. They feel (unreasonably) that this scientific evidence is the only way to determine whether the defendant is 100 percent innocent or guilty.DNA evidence is rarely as easy to come by in real life as it is on TV, where eagle-eyed investigators can spy a drop of blood from across the room. In reality, DNA degrades so quickly that the amount you can obtain from a single blood drop (or strand of hair) might not be enough to identify the person it belonged to. And you can forget about trying to get DNA from extremely old human tissue samples—there won't be anything left. Read more.Source: Forensic Science.net, July 26, 2010It's not about what they did. It's about what we do.

    Hiding From the Death Penalty
    27.07.2010 13:30

    Last month, Utah prison officials took a death row prisoner named Ronnie Gardner to a specially designed room, strapped him tightly into a chair, and draped a black hood over his head. By a prearranged signal, a group of five volunteer executioners aimed their Winchester rifles at a target placed over his heart, and opened fire.Ronnie Gardner's choice to die by firing squad pierced what Albert Camus called the "padded words" with which we have smothered and hidden capital punishment in our society, preventing us from seeing clearly what it "really is" and honestly debating its legitimacy. "The firing squad, please," came as close as humanly possible to showing the nation, and the world, what Camus described as "the machine" of the death penalty, making us "touch the wood and steel" of it.The truth is that many of the ugly realities of capital punishment are still covered up in our society, described with euphemisms that make the death penalty seem deceptively palatable. We understandably focus on the terrible crimes that capital defendants have committed, but we refuse to examine the origins of their violence. Thus, we are still a nation that largely ignores the plight of desperately poor children, does little to alleviate the suffering of those who are traumatized by neglect and abuse, and turns a blind eye toward underfunded, incompetent, and sometimes callously cruel juvenile institutions that frequently do more harm than good to troubled and vulnerable young people. Instead, we rise up in indignation when one of these profoundly poor, chronically ignored, and badly mistreated children grow up to become, as Ronnie Gardner described himself, a "nasty little bugger," only then paying much attention, with many clamoring for the death penalty to be imposed. Click here to read this feature in full.By Craig Haney, a professor of psychology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, a leading expert on capital punishment and the author of Death by Design; The Huffington Post,July 27, 2010It's not about what they did. It's about what we do.

    Death Penalty News from TMN

    Video of Entire Hour-Plus Long Discussion of Todd Willingham Case at Texas Forensic Science Commission Meeting July 23, 2010
    26.07.2010 23:07

    Below are videos shot by Texas Moratorium Network of the entire discussion on the agenda item dealing with the Todd Willingham case at the Texas Forensic Science Commission on Friday, July 23, 2010 in Houston. The discussion lasted more than an hour. It is divided into seven parts because YouTube limits videos to ten minutes. There are also two shorter videos of Barry Scheck and Patricia Willingham Cox delivering their public comments at the end of the meeting.Texas Forensic Science Commission Discussion of Todd Willingham Case July 23, 2010 Part 1/7Texas Forensic Science Commission Discussion of Todd Willingham Case July 23, 2010 Part 2/7Texas Forensic Science Commission Discussion of Todd Willingham Case July 23, 2010 Part 3/7Texas Forensic Science Commission Discussion of Todd Willingham Case July 23, 2010, Part 4/7Texas Forensic Science Commission Discussion of Todd Willingham Case July 23, 2010, Part 5/7Texas Forensic Science Commission Discussion of Todd Willingham Case July 23, 2010, Part 6/7Texas Forensic Science Commission Discussion of Todd Willingham Case July 23, 2010, Part 7/7The videos below are of comments delivered during the public comment period, which took place a couple of hours after the main discussion of the Willingham case by the Commission.Barry Scheck Speaking to Texas Forensic Science Commission July 23, 2010Todd Willingham's Cousin and Stepmother at Texas Forensic Science Commission Meeting July 23, 2010



    Video of Barry Scheck Speaking to Texas Forensic Science Commission
    26.07.2010 09:32

    Below is a video of The Innocence Project's Barry Scheck speaking to Texas Forensic Science Commission in Houston on July 23, 2010. Video was shot by Texas Moratorium Network. Watch the whole video to understand Barry Scheck's objections to the Commission's tentative findings. Click here to watch the video on YouTube or click here to watch it on TMN's Facebook page.The final report is not yet complete, so the Commission could still take into account Scheck's objections.Around the 3:35 minute is when the fireworks start after John Bradley motions to his assistant that she should tell Scheck that his time is up.http://camerontoddwillingham.comFrom the Houston Chronicle:A commission reviewing a disputed arson finding that led to a Corsicana man's 2004 execution for the deaths of his three young children said in a preliminary report Friday that the fire investigators used flawed science but didn't commit negligence or misconduct.Members of the state commission investigating a controversial Corsicana arson case in which three children died — and for which their father was executed — acknowledged on Friday that state and local arson investigators used "flawed science" in determining the blaze had been deliberately set.But the Texas Forensic Science Commission panel heading the inquiry also found insufficient evidence to prove that state Deputy Fire Marshal Manuel Vasquez and Corsicana Assistant Fire Chief Douglas Fogg were negligent or guilty of misconduct in their arson work.The investigators, they said, likely used standards accepted in Texas at the time of the fire, which erupted at the home of Cameron Todd Willingham in December 1991. Willingham went to his execution in 2004 proclaiming his innocence in the deaths of his 1-year-old twins and 2-year-old step daughter.The tentative findings were announced at the commission's quarterly meeting in Houston.Commissioners authorized the four-member committee to write a draft report reflecting their findings to be acted on later this summer. The panel, headed by commission Chairman John Bradley, also will solicit more information regarding the state of investigation standards in 1991. It will accept written public comments until Aug. 12.Friday's action was the latest chapter in the contentious review of the arson investigators' work spurred by a complaint filed by the New York-based Innocence Project. The commission is not tasked with determining whether Texas might have executed an innocent man, but whether the arson investigators followed sound scientific principles.Other reviews criticalAt least three expert reviews, including a commission-financed study by Baltimore fire expert Craig Beyler, have been critical of the arson investigations. Burn patterns, multiple points of origin and other phenomenon investigators found at the scene wrongly were interpreted as signs the fire deliberately was set, the experts concluded.Beyler, who wrote that investigators observed neither the standards of the National Fire Prevention Association, adopted shortly after the blaze, nor standards applicable at the time of the fire, was scheduled to appear before commissioners last September.Days before the meeting, however, Gov. Rick Perry replaced the commission chairman with Bradley, district attorney in Williamson County. The session at which Beyler was scheduled to speak was canceled, and the fire expert never appeared before the body.Friday's action spurred a heated exchange between Bradley and Innocence Project co-founder Barry Scheck, who bolted from his seat to protest. Bradley repeatedly refused to yield the floor.Family optimisticScheck's organization argues that the state fire marshal's office should have been aware of updated arson investigation standards and - in any event - should have advised prosecutors and the court of them when they were adopted.The new standards went into effect in early 1992."It's alarming that they've missed the point of our allegations," Innocence Project policy director Stephen Saloom said. "The state fire marshal's office had a continuing duty to inform prosecutors, the court, pardons and paroles or the governor of the unreliability of the old evidence."While national fire experts may have known in late 1991 that new standards were in the works, investigation committee members said, it's possible rank-and-file investigators did not.Willingham's mother, Eugenia Willingham, and his cousin, Patricia Cox, who were present for Friday's session, viewed the commission's action as a positive development."We're cautiously optimistic," Cox said. "We're Todd's voice after death. We're going to exonerate him. We're not going away."Eugenia Willingham said her son would have been pleased. "His wish was that we clear his name," she said. "He was innocent and prosecuted for something he didn't do. ... I hope that somewhere or other he saw what happened today."



    Video of Todd Willingham's Family at Meeting of Texas Forensic Science Commission
    26.07.2010 09:30

    Texas Moratorium Network shot this video of Todd Willingham's cousin Patricia Willingham Cox speaking at the meeting of the Texas Forensic Science Commission in Houston on July 23, 2010. Click here to watch the video on YouTube. Or click here to watch it on the TMN Facebook page.Todd's stepmother Eugenia Willingham is sitting beside Patricia while she speaks. Normally, when a family member speaks at a hearing, for instance at a committee hearing at the Legislature, the person chairing the hearing is very nice and thanks the person for coming and maybe even offers some words of comfort to them if they start crying. The chair often even says something like they know how difficult it is to speak in public at a hearing like this. We have seen that happen a lot at the Legislature, but John Bradley has absolutely no social skills or empathy, so he didn't say anything after Patricia Cox spoke or after Eugenia is asked if she wants to speak, but she declines because she is weeping. What an ass John Bradley is.A commission reviewing a disputed arson finding that led to a Corsicana man's 2004 execution for the deaths of his three young children said in a preliminary report Friday that the fire investigators used flawed science but didn't commit negligence or misconduct.Patricia Cox, Todd Willingham's cousin, told commission members that she appreciated the group's acknowledgment that the forensic evidence used to convict her loved one was flawed."Even though there may not have been any malice or intent by fire investigators about not being informed on current standards, that doesn't excuse the fact that, based on this misinformation, Cameron Todd Willingham was executed, and that can't be corrected," said a tearful Cox.Willingham's stepmother, Eugenia Willingham, was too upset to speak during the meeting's public comment section. But during a break, she said she couldn't believe the panel's conclusion and vowed to continue fighting for her stepson's exoneration.Both Cox and Eugenia Willingham came from their hometown of Ardmore, Okla., to attend the meeting. Two other women at the meeting held signs with photographs of Willingham that read: "No More Cover Up! Todd: Innocent and Executed!" and "Put Todd Willingham on the Agenda."



    Watch Live Video Stream of Texas Forensic Science Commission Meeting (Todd Willingham case is on the agenda)
    23.07.2010 18:27

    Here is a link to the live stream of the Forensic Science Meeting.  View the meeting agenda.Eugenia Willingham and Patricia Willingham Cox will probably make public comments to the commission at the end of the meeting. The are pictured below with TMN's Scott Cobb.



    Shame on Those Abolitionist Groups for "Throwing Mumia Abu-Jamal Under the Bus"
    23.07.2010 12:05

    We pass along the story below with great sadness. Texas Moratorium Network stands with everyone who faces an unjust sentence, including Mumia Abu-Jamal. There are other ways to build bridges to new potential supporters that do not include forsaking someone who was unjustly sentenced to death. In the recent case in Austin of David Powell, Texas Moratorium Network did not shirk our responsibility to speak out and work hard to try to stop the execution of Powell, just because the Austin Police Association was applying political pressure to ensure that the execution was carried out. Shame on those organizations who signed the memo to the WCADP."Throwing Mumia Abu-Jamal Under the Bus"By Dave Lindorff"I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong."--Frederick DouglassOn the evening of February 25, participants at the Fourth World Congress Against the Death Penalty in Geneva, Switzerland had assembled from all over the globe for a dramatic Voices of Victims evening. It got more dramatic than they had anticipated though, when suddenly a cell phone rang and Robert R. Bryan, lead defense attorney for Mumia Abu-Jamal, jumped up on the stage to announce that his client had called him from death row in Pennsylvania.The audience sat in rapt silence as the emcee held the phone up to the microphone. Abu-Jamal, on death row for 28 years after a widely disputed conviction for the murder of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner, greeted the delegates and then, as he has done on many occasions before, described to them the horrors of life in prison for the 20,000 people around the world who are awaiting execution.A small group of American death penalty abolitionist leaders, led by Renny Cushing, executive director of Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights, stalked out of the hall. Two members of MVFHR, however, remained in the hall: Bill Babbitt, whose brother Manny, a Vietnam vet suffering acute post-traumatic stress disorder, was executed in California; and Bill Pelke, whose grandmother was murdered by a girl whom he later befriended and helped to spare from execution. Babbitt even joined Bryan onstage during Abu-Jamal's brief address.What neither Babbitt nor Pelke, nor Abu-Jamal and his attorney, Bryan, knew at the time was that way back in December, leaders and individual board members of several of the organizations in the US abolitionist movement had signed--without their full boards’ or their memberships’ knowledge--a “confidential” memorandum, which they then sent to the French organizers of the World Congress, stating bluntly that, “As international representatives of the US abolition movement, we cannot agree to the involvement of Abu-Jamal or his lawyers in the World Congress beyond attendance.”Purporting to be from “the US members of the Steering Committee” of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty (though hardly an inclusive list of that committee’s membership) and titled, “Involvement of Mumia Abu-Jamal endangers the US coalition for abolition of the death penalty,” the memo claimed that the French organizers of the World Congress, Together Against the Death Penalty (ECPM), had arranged to have Abu-Jamal speak “over objection.” The memo further further asserted that the abolitionist movement in the US is trying to “cultivate” the support of the ultra-conservative and staunchly pro-death penalty Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), an organization representing some 35,000 police officers in the US that advocates the execution of Abu-Jamal and all other prisoners convicted of killing of police officers. The FOP, said the memo, has “announced a boycott of organizations and individuals who support Abu-Jamal,” and therefore anything done by the Congress to aid his cause would be “dangerously counter-productive to the abolition movement in the US.”ThisCantBeHappening! this past week obtained a copy of that secret memorandum.When we showed it to some other members of the boards of the organizations whose officers or individual board members had signed their names to it, responses ranged from consternation to outrage. Babbitt’s brother Manny was killed as a direct result of a corrupt law enforcement system in California that pressed for execution, even though it was clear from medical testimony that the elderly grandmother he allegedly killed actually died of shock when she discovered him breaking and entering her apartment. Left in the dark about the memo despite his being on the MVFHR board, Babbitt said, “My brother Manny’s last words to me were to always take the high road, and to me that means telling the truth and being open and transparent.” He added, regarding the content of the memo, “I think throwing Mumia under the bus is not the way to go in the abolitionist movement. You don’t make bargains with a wolf whose motive is to devour.”Robert Meeropol, a son of Ethyl and Julius Rosenberg, who were executed as spies in 1953, is also a member of the MVFHR board. Currently traveling on behalf of the organization in Asia, he said through a staffer in the US that he did not know about the memo, and added that he still stands “fully in support of a new trial for Mumia Abu-Jamal.”Several calls seeking a comment from Cushing or Lowenstein remain unanswered, though a staffer at the MVFHR Boston office, Susanna Sheffer, said, “This is a complicated thing. You need to understand the depth and texture of this.”Also surprised at the memo was actor Michael Farrell, president of the California abolitionist group Death Penalty Focus. Farrell, a long-time supporter of the call for a new trial for Abu-Jamal, said he had never seen the memo, though it was signed by a member of the DPF board, attorney Elizabeth Zitrin.Other signers of the memo were Thomas H. “Speedy” Rice of the National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Kritsin Houlé of the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and Juan Matos de Juan of the Puerto Rican Bar Assn.Bryan, a veteran death penalty defense lawyer who served 10 years on the board of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty--three of them as the organization’s chair--says, “In all my years as an activist opposing the death penalty, I have never heard of any individual or group in that fight singling out anyone as an exception to our campaign to abolish capital punishment. Everyone is treated equally. To single someone out and say they don’t count is chilling. Where do you draw the line? At people accused of killing cops? At people accused of killing old ladies? People accused of killing children? Where does it stop? It’s appalling!”Heidi Beghosian, executive director of the National Lawyers Guild, an organization that has long been in the forefront of the campaign to end the death penalty in the US, and which was not advised of the plan to circulate the memo on behalf of the US Steering Committee to the World Coalition, despite the NLG's being a member of the WCADP, roundly condemned the secret effort to silence Abu-Jamal at the March event.“Mumia Abu-Jamal’s case is emblematic of the inherent flaws in the capital punishment system,” she said. “That he is castigated by leaders in the abolitionist movement shows precisely what is wrong with the system—it is a system enslaved to the whims and personal biases of police, prosecutor, judge, and jury. While cultivating certain voices of law enforcement may assist in efforts to achieve abolition, it should not be at the expense of exposing a case that embodies some of the most reprehensible actions on the part of the police, the district attorney and the judiciary. The powerful FOP, and their heavy-handed efforts to vilify Abu-Jamal and his supporters, should not be the barometer by which abolitionist leaders gauge their strategic priorities. Members of the abolitionist movement should be working together and not further censoring and ostracizing a death row inmate.”What makes the American abolitionists’ petulant and manipulative behavior as expressed in the secret memo and their cynical threat to withdraw from the Congress particularly outrageous is that Abu-Jamal’s arrest, trial and appeals process has been, as Beghosian notes, a textbook case of police and prosecutor corruption, malfeasance and abuse. From the beginning, even before his arrest, Abu-Jamal’s case was poisoned by a police lust for vengeance. Although he had been shot through the lung and liver by a bullet fired from Officer Faulkner’s service revolver, and was in danger of dying of internal bleeding that was filling his lungs with blood, Abu-Jamal was left lying in a police wagon for almost half an hour before he was finally delivered to a hospital emergency room, where hospital staff and at least one police officer on the scene observed him being kicked and punched by the officers delivering him.During the jury selection process at the beginning of his trial, the presiding judge, Albert Sabo, who as a county sheriff’s deputy was an FOP member before he was made a judge, was overheard by a second judge  and his court stenographer saying to his own court clerk, as he exited the courtroom through the jurdge’s robing room, “Yeah and I’m gonna help them fry that nigger!”During the tortuous appeals process, both the state and federal courts have shamelessly bent their rules and violated precedents to deny Abu-Jamal the benefits of precedents that have been routinely accorded other appellants. Third Circuit Appeals Court Judge Thomas Ambro filed a stinging dissent to a decision by his two colleagues, who effectively created new law from the bench in rejecting Abu-Jamal’s well-founded Batson claim of racial bias by the prosecution during jury selection at his trail. Scarcely concealing his outrage, Judge Ambro wrote: "Our Court has previously reached the merits of Batson claims on habeas review in cases where the petitioner did not make a timely objection during jury selection--signaling that our Circuit does not have a federal contemporaneous objection rule--and I see no reason why we should not afford Abu-Jamal the courtesy of our precedents." He added, "Why we pick this case to depart from that reasoning I do not know."Abu-Jamal himself, interviewed by phone last Friday from his cell at the super-max death row facility SCI-Greene in western Pennsylvania, blasted the attempt to silence him at the Congress, and to ostracize him from the American abolitionist movement. “They are really making deals with the devil,” he said, of claims that the US abolitionist movement was trying to gain the support of the FOP. “My instinct, being from Philadelphia, is that money was passed, though I have no evidence to prove it.” He added, “This secret action is a threat to the entire abolitionist movement. They are saying that because the opposition (to abolition) is so strong, we should not fight. If you have that attitude, why have an abolitionist movement at all?”Abu-Jamal, whose death penalty was lifted by a federal judge in 2001, only to have the US Supreme Court remand that decision back to the Third Circuit, where it could be reimposed, and who continues, in no small part thanks to pressure from the Pennsylvania FOP, to be held in solitary confinement on death row, where he maintains his innocence, calls the signers of the memo “co-conspirators,” and says they are “naive” to believe they can win over the FOP by abandoning him to his fate.“If the slavery abolitionists had taken this approach back in 1860,” he says, “and said okay let’s free the slaves, except those uppity ones with prices on their heads like Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglass, we’d still have slavery today.” Abu-Jamal said it appeared that the abolitionist movement appeared to have lost its way, and said that it needed to be broadened to more closely reflect the population of the nation’s death rows. where nearly everyone is poor, and where 53% of the doomed inmates are non-white.Here is the text of the secret Memorandum to WCADP.CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM to ECPMfrom the US members of the Steering Committee of the WCADP Involvement of Mumia Abu-Jamal endangers the US coalition for abolition of the death penaltyECPM has unilaterally, and over objection, determined to give the Mumia Abu-Jamal case a prominent role in the upcoming 4th World Congress Against the Death Penalty, including the participation of Mr. Abu-Jamal's lawyers and his direct participation by telephone. The US members of the Steering Committee of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty do not agree to this, because it will be counter-productive to our effort to achieve abolition in our country.The Abu-Jamal case, regardless of its merits, acts as a lightning rod that galvanizes opponents of abolition and neutralizes key constituencies in the cause of abolition. Continuing to give Abu-Jamal focused attention unnecessarily attracts our strongest opponents and alienates coalition partners at a time when we need to build alliances, not foster hatred and enmity.While Abu-Jamal still attracts some positive attention outside of the United States, it is at a real cost to the US abolition effort. In 1999, the world's largest association of professional law enforcement officers, the Fraternal Order of Police, announced a boycott of organizations and individuals who support Abu-Jamal. Bills have been introduced in both houses of the US federal legislature condemning the naming of streets for Abu-Jamal. The result is that Abu-Jamal, rather  than abolition of the death penalty, becomes the issue and the focus of attention. That is dangerously counter-productive to the abolition movement in the US.The voices of the Innocent, the voices of Victims and the voices of Law Enforcement are the most persuasive factors in changing public opinion and the views of decision-makers (politicians) and opinion leaders (media). Continuing to shine a spotlight on Abu-Jamal, who has had so much public exposure for so many years, threatens to alienate these three most important partnership groups.The support of law enforcement officials is essential to achieving abolition in the United States. It is essential to the national abolition strategy of US abolition activists and attorneys, that we cultivate the voices of police, prosecutors and law enforcement experts, to support our call for an end to the death penalty. It was key in New Jersey and in New Mexico, it is fundamental to abolition throughout the US, and it will be a primary focus for 2010 and beyond. We have begun to make real progress with police officers and prosecutors speaking out against the death penalty as a failed policy.«In a national poll released in 2009, the nation's police chiefs ranked the death penalty last in their priorities for effective crime reduction. The officers did not believe the death penalty acted as a deterrent to murder, and they rated it as one of most inefficient uses of taxpayer dollars in fighting crime .... "Death Penalty Information Center, The Death Penalty in 2009: Year End Report, December 18,2009. If the 4th World Congress gives Abu-Jamal and his lawyers the focus and attention proposed by ECPM, the US movement for abolition will be exposed to a serious backlash that will directly damage the delicate alliances we are building with essential groups. As international representatives of the US abolition movement, we cannot agree to the involvement of Abu-Jamal or his lawyers in the World Congress beyond attendance.For these reasons, providing Abu-Jamal the World Congress stage will require us to consider how to distance our programs in order to protect our vital alliances with our key partners and constituencies. To be effective ad- vocates within the US we must and will continue our strategic approach to abolition with our core allies and our evolving partners. Featuring Mr. Abu-Jamal's case as ECPM has proposed presents an unacceptably high risk of fracturing a developing but still fragile alliance with vitally important constituencies - constituencies that can either help our movement reach the goal of abolition or severely hinder our progress.Elizabeth Zitrin (DPF), Renny Cushing and Kate Lowenstein (MVFHR), Speedy Rice (NACDL), Kristin Houle (TCADP), Juan Matos de Juan (PRBA)21 December 2009