
A remark I hear far too often is “I want to volunteer in BeWelcome, but I don’t know how/where/what!”. Of course, on the one hand it’s never easy to start getting involved in something, but surely we can do better?
What makes it so hard to get involved and to stay involved?
- There’s a lot of barriers in place: You have to have a BW profile, enter your name here, there and everywhere.
- It’s often unclear who is supposed to help you along, so you’re just sort of waiting for a reply from someone.
- You have to pick a team or teams and then it’s still not clear what your actual tasks might/could be.
As always, I think it’s important to start from good principles, so that the actions afterwards taken are logical and effective. The main principles I see here are:
- Getting involved should be clear, fast and straight-forward.
- It’s important to have a personal connection to your responsibilities. Our best work is done by people that have a very clear view of what is expected of them.
- Keep it simple!
I think having “coordinators” like Philipp is actually very helpful, but the idea of all those “teams” seems quite far from the underlying reality. Think about it, we have almost 1 team per two
active volunteers
(let’s say active means a post per week) and most active volunteers are part of multiple teams… It is also clear that almost everyone works ad-hoc and only on things they are interested in. To me, this is fine, but it also means we have to work with that in mind.
So, I would like to propose a few things.
First, I think task-based thinking should prevail over team-based thinking. Theoretically, any active volunteer can pick up any task that is desired, as long as they are clearly defined. That in turn means that the current coordinators should primarily focus on finding and writing down possible tasks, from consensus or decision in the organization or from a bug report or question. They should also focus on supporting and (re)activating volunteers that pick up tasks within their “area of expertise”. As an example, a translation coordinator could say “language … needs better translation, who can help?” and subsequently support anyone who volunteers with access rights, explanations, etc.
Secondly, I think the BeVolunteer forum (at least) should reflect this ideology. We shouldn’t be dividing posts by
topic, but by
intention: What is their purpose? Is it a question? A general idea? Does someone need help? Is it a
task that can be done? That way, anyone can look into the right area to either get an answer, to volunteer or to make a remark, regardless of topic.
So, what could an intention based forum look like?
- Help
Are you stuck with something on BeWelcome or BeVolunteer? Find help here.
- Questions and answers
Ask questions about BeVolunteer or BeWelcome here.
- Volunteer
Looking for something to do? We have plenty of things to work on.
(This could be split into “open tasks” and “closed tasks”.)
- Big Ideas
Do you have a great idea? Post it here!
- Organization
Polls, reports, etc. This would be the “official stuff”.
Ideas could be developed in “big ideas”, submitted to a poll in “Organization” if necessary, to be broken down into tasks in “Volunteer”. In “Volunteer”, there would have to be clear links to the relevant coordinator (preferably it’s who submits it there), should the volunteer need support. Depending on a someone’s available time and personality, it would make sense to help out with small things (Q & A) or to get involved in the big theoretical discussions in “Big Ideas”. And again, coordinators would need to be able to extract polls, conclude discussions and formulate tasks.
The “old” forum would need to be put into an archive, possibly with interesting threads moved to relevant new locations.
An interesting idea would also be to have multiple coordinators per topic (why not?) and perhaps even a few “multipurpose coordinators”, being people that can help coordinate with just about any topic. (People like Frank, Philipp, Claudia, Kasper, Jean-Yves and myself come to mind.)
I’m hoping the current coordinators are enthusiastic about these ideas or at least willing to try it out. Let’s hear some feedback and get the fire burning!
Update (2008-07-17): After some discussion, I think a good point can be made to combine “Help” and “Questions & answers”, if only because it is quite difficult for an average user to see the difference between them.